The Threat of a Good Example: How the Empire Hunted the Lifeboats
As is the established routine in these essays, I’m utilising the variables from my SETE 2.0 model. The SETE 2.0 paper is here, or a conceptual explanation begins with this essay, with my original paper introduced in part 2.
There is a comforting myth told by the architects of the modern global economy. It suggests that our hyper-financialised, planet-consuming political economy was the inevitable result of human evolution. We are told that older, ecologically balanced, steady-state cultures simply faded away because they were ‘inefficient’, ‘primitive’, or unable to compete in the marketplace of ideas.
This is a lie.
Ecological, steady-state cultures did not naturally fade away. They were systematically, violently, and deliberately eradicated.
To understand why the ‘Giant’ of our globalised political economy is currently suffocating under its own weight, we have to understand how it killed off the alternatives. We have to look at the thermodynamic history of the 19th and 20th centuries not as a march of progress, but as a Darwinian clearing operation.
The Two Enlightenments and the Sceptical tradition
The philosophical root of our current crisis lies in a divergence that occurred centuries ago. What we call ‘The Enlightenment’ was not a monolith; it was fractured into two deeply opposing worldviews.
The first was the ‘Strong Enlightenment’. This was the mechanistic, anthropocentric worldview of Descartes and later Neoclassical economists. It viewed nature as dead matter to be dominated, extracted, and turned into capital. It denied physical limits. It is the operating system of the Gr (expansionist) society, programmed to blindly maximise gross systemic throughput (Pgross) to feed an ever-expanding Institutional Mass (MI) and an extractive wealth siphon (α).
The second was the ‘Sceptical Enlightenment’. Rooted in thinkers like Baruch Spinoza, it recognised that humanity was entirely embedded within the “One Substance” of nature. You cannot ‘externalise’ a cost in a Spinozan universe because there is no ‘outside’ to externalise to; you only degrade the single biophysical base we all share. This formed the intellectual basis for the GK (K-strategy) society: a steady-state culture that seeks to maximise human wellbeing within a strictly maintained, balanced energy throughput.
Crucially, this GK blueprint is not merely a philosophical preference; it is our biological baseline. As a species, Homo sapiens evolved in K-selected environments. Our primary evolutionary advantage is not atomic predation, but hyper-social, collective metabolic coordination. The Sceptical tradition simply aligned its political economy with our biological reality.
As the Strong Enlightenment discovered the colossal, one-time geological subsidy of fossil fuels, it went into overdrive. But the Sceptical lineage did not disappear; it evolved alongside the industrial revolution, issuing rigorous, scientific warnings that were deliberately buried by the architects of the wealth siphon:
The Physical Limit: In 1824, physicist Sadi Carnot proved that the industrial “Heat Engine” was bound by strict limits. You cannot have 100% efficiency; there is always an entropic tax. Neoclassical economists completely ignored this, preferring mathematical models built on reversible, frictionless Newtonian time.
Wealth vs. Illth: In 1860, John Ruskin warned that the expansionist economy was measuring the wrong thing. While the ‘Strong’ Victorians were obsessed with industrial output, the accumulation of capital, and what we today call GDP, Ruskin argued that this extractive metric was actually “Illth”—the production of devastation and depletion masquerading as progress.
The Ghost Signal: In the 1920s, Nobel-winning chemist Frederick Soddy committed the ultimate heresy against the Strong Enlightenment. He pointed out the fatal category error of modern finance: treating Debt (a mathematical abstraction that can compound to infinity) as if it were Energy (a physical reality bound by thermodynamics). Soddy warned that you cannot pay a physical debt with a mathematical ghost, and was promptly ostracised by the economics profession.
The tragedy of the last three centuries is that in an environment flush with a massive energy surplus, an aggressive r-strategist will always temporarily outcompete a balanced K-strategist. The Gr system used the fossil subsidy to build demographic and military mass, selectively rewarding the sociopathic, extractive phenotypes required to operate the wealth siphon. It then turned that mass against the truths of the Sceptical tradition.
The American Crucible: Eradicating the GK Threat
Nowhere is this thermodynamic clearing operation more obvious than in the 19th-century United States, where it was expressed through ‘American Exceptionalism’ and ‘Manifest Destiny’.
The expanding American Empire did not just view Indigenous cultures as an obstacle to land; it viewed them as an existential, ideological threat. This threat wasn’t merely theoretical; it was an acute demographic crisis for the early colonies. The colonial authorities faced a terrifying phenomenon: European settlers were routinely defecting to Indigenous tribes. More alarmingly, when these ‘white Indians’ were captured or ‘rescued’, they frequently fled straight back to the woods.
Thinkers like Benjamin Franklin famously lamented this asymmetry. Once Europeans had tasted the egalitarian, hyper-social GK lifestyle—where metabolic coordination replaced the rigid, labour-intensive hierarchies of colonial extraction—they found the Gr society intolerable. By contrast, Indigenous people practically never defected to European settlements.
This terrified the architects of the Strong Enlightenment. It provided empirical proof that the ‘primitive’ steady-state economy was far more conducive to human well-being than the ‘civilised’ wealth siphon. If the European underclass fully realised this, the Gr engine would lose the compliant labour force required to maintain its gross throughput (Pgross).
Therefore, the eradication of Indigenous cultures wasn’t just a physical land grab; it was the necessary destruction of a highly attractive, competing social model. If a GK society is permitted to exist alongside a Gr society, it exposes the fundamental lie of the expansionist empire. Throughout the 19th century, the institutions of the State (MI) were deployed to eradicate this GK baseline. The slaughter of the North American bison was a deliberate, state-sponsored thermodynamic weapon—an intentional severing of the biophysical flux that powered these Indigenous lifeboats, forcing them into dependency and starvation.
The 20th Century: The Romantic Trap and the Stitched Beast
By the 20th century, the Sceptical tradition had been driven almost entirely underground. But the ‘Strong Enlightenment’ twins—the Central Planner (Stalin) and the Neoliberal (Hayek)—faced a different kind of opposition: the Romantic counter-Enlightenment.
The Romantics warned us of the ‘Stitched Beast’—an industrial economy stitched together from dead matter and galvanised by credit. However, we must confront a darker historical reality: the warnings of the Romantics were frequently hijacked.
The Romantics would have been appalled to see their celebration of the ‘organic’ and the ‘vital’ turned into the fuel for Fascism. This was the Romantic Trap. Fascism instrumentalised the critique of industrial alienation, but did so to create a hyper-kinetic Gr war machine. By replacing the Sceptical tradition’s grounding in physical limits with a “Vitalist” obsession with the Will, Fascism allowed the Strong Enlightenment to bypass thermodynamic reality. This corruption served the global Gr system perfectly; it allowed the architects of the wealth siphon to frame any rejection of the mechanistic industrial model as ‘incipient fascism’, poisoning the well for genuine, decentralised GK alternatives.
Hunting the Real Alternatives
Whenever genuine Ground Agency attempted to manifest based on the principles of the Sceptical Enlightenment, the Empire responded with lethal kinetic force or institutional assassination.
Consider the post-WWII Italian Anarchists and the later Autonomia movements. These were profound attempts to establish decentralised, worker-led, community-based economies. How did the Empire respond? Through Operation Gladio and the ‘Strategy of Tension’. The US, NATO, and the Italian deep state explicitly orchestrated false-flag terrorism to crush these decentralised movements, terrifying the populace back into the rigid structures of the Neoliberal state. The BBC’s own Timewatch investigation—famously “accidentally” deleted from the BBC Archive and now surviving only as a degraded VHS encode—laid bare the architecture of Gladio.
In the Global South, the suppression was even more naked. When Thomas Sankara took power in Burkina Faso in the 1980s, he pursued a radically ecological, self-sufficient K-strategy. He refused IMF debt (αf), planted millions of trees to halt desertification, and localised production. Within four years, he was assassinated in a French- and US-backed coup.
When outright assassination isn’t the preferred tool, the Empire deploys total thermodynamic siege. Look at the current reality of Cuba. For over sixty years, the US blockade has functioned as an artificial exergy vacuum, systematically designed to starve the island of the physical inputs (Pgross) required to maintain a complex society. As global energy markets tighten today, we are watching the Cuban grid repeatedly collapse. This has now escalated to a complete elimination of oil imports and explicit US rhetoric of invasion. As Trump recently stated:
“All my life I’ve been hearing about the United States and Cuba. ‘When will the United States do it?’ I do believe I’ll be having the honour of taking Cuba. That would be a big honour... Taking Cuba in some form. I mean, whether I free it, take it. I think I can do anything I want with it, you want to know the truth? They’re a very weakened nation right now.”
This is not the inherent failure of an alternative model; it is the result of a Gr hegemon spending generations deliberately severing a nation’s biophysical lifelines to ensure a non-extractive political economy cannot serve as a successful example.
Even when the resistance uses the Empire’s own tools, the system simply rewrites the rules. The decade-long persecution of human rights lawyer Steven Donziger is a modern masterclass in this. After Indigenous tribes in the Ecuadorian Amazon won a historic $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron for the deliberate dumping of toxic waste, Donziger was subjected to the longest misdemeanor house arrest in US history. The message was clear: you can win in the courts of the Material Base, but the Ideological Superstructure (S) will mobilise its mass to criminalise the victory. The Gr engine cannot allow the Earth to sue for damages.
The Resurrection of the Lifeboats
This dark history is the source of our greatest hope.
The Empire spent two hundred years violently suppressing steady-state, bioregional models because they work. The blueprints of Spinoza, Carnot, and Soddy were never refuted by physics; they were merely temporarily outgunned by an empire burning a one-time inheritance of cheap oil.
Today, that inheritance is failing. The Empire needed a geopolitical emergency to mask its thermodynamic collapse, and so it engineered the current war on Iran (and by extension, China) to justify activating its 15% universal tariff vacuum. The goal was to desperately suck Eurodollars from the global extremities to fund the staggering $3 trillion per quarter roll-over of US Treasuries—the Empire’s bare minimum maintenance power (Pmaint). But the strategy has gone spectacularly wrong. By triggering catastrophic kinetic strikes on Middle Eastern hydrocarbon infrastructure, the Gr system accidentally destroyed the physical basis of the petrodollar itself. In trying to save the financial superstructure, they blew up the material base. As the global baseload drops, the Empire is rapidly losing the Effective Circulating Power (Peff) required to project force and maintain its illusion.
We do not need to invent a new way of living from scratch. As the ‘Stitched Beast’ finally collapses, the structural lid is lifting. For the first time in three centuries, the thermodynamic space is opening up for the GK lifeboats to re-emerge. The political economy will not save us, because it was built to consume us. We must stop trying to repair the Empire’s engine, and start remembering how to build the lifeboats it tried so desperately to make us forget.



One of your most poetic articles. Five stars. Tops.
I would say the most insidious and pervasive way the system combats sustainable and self sufficient ways of life is through the perennial subsidies to industrial agriculture and farming. They are a guaranteed everywhere in the world and they are massive: they allow industrial agriculture and farming to never have to worry about price and cost of the inputs, physical sustainability or the consequences of the degradation of the land and they ensure anyone who dares to practice sustainable agriculture and farming can never profit enough to be financially independent, forcing them into exile from the major economy.
Absolutely no single party dares to question these subsidies: right wing and even libertarian parties who love to complain about subsidies being socialism would never even think about cutting those. Left parties mostly sell out on this issue and communist parties love industrialization so much (industrialism is ingrained into their identities) that they would ramble against sustainability as a conspiracy from the bourgeois.